Free calculator · Post-merger / value creation

Value creation bridge: where the PE return really comes from

Break down the equity value creation of a buyout between entry and exit into its three drivers: operational EBITDA growth, multiple re-rating and deleveraging. With MOIC, gross IRR and the percentage attribution per driver. Live in your browser, no sign-up.

Instant result
No registration
Runs in your browser

Start calculating

Amounts in €m, multiples as ×. Calculated live in your browser. * = required field.

Entry (acquisition)

Entry EBITDA *

€m

= €10,000,000Entry multiple *

EV/EBITDA, DACH lower mid-market 5-9×Entry net debt

€m

Entry equity €45m

Exit (sale)

Exit EBITDA *

€m

= €14,000,000Exit multiple *

may be below entry (contraction)Exit net debt

€m

Exit equity €104m

Holding period and distributions

Holding period

years

Cumulative distributions / recap

€m

optional, MOIC/IRR only

Value creation calculated

MOIC

2.31×

Gross IRR p.a.

18.2%

Entry equity€45,000,000

Exit equity€104,000,000

Value creation (equity)€59,000,000

Attribution

EBITDA growth47.5%

Multiple expansion23.7%

Deleveraging28.8%

76.3% “earned” (operational + deleveraging) vs. market re-rating

Runs entirely in your browser. Nothing leaves this page.

Bridge: entry equity → exit equity

Navy = anchor (entry/exit equity). Green = value contribution, red = value destruction.

Driver detail

Entry equity (capital invested)	€45,000,000
EBITDA growth (operational)	€28,000,000
Multiple expansion (re-rating)	€14,000,000
Deleveraging (debt repayment)	€17,000,000
Exit equity (sale proceeds)	€104,000,000

At a glance

The value creation bridge breaks down the difference between exit equity and entry equity of a PE deal exactly, with no residual, into three drivers: EBITDA growth (ΔEBITDA × entry multiple), multiple expansion (ΔMultiple × exit EBITDA) and deleveraging (entry net debt − exit net debt). Entry equity plus these three contributions equals exit equity to the cent.

Entry equity = entry EBITDA × entry multiple − entry net debt; exit equity likewise with the exit values. They are what the sponsor invests and what it realises on the sale.
By algebraic identity, the three drivers add up exactly to exit equity − entry equity (zero residual). The EBITDA × multiple cross term is absorbed exactly once into the multiple bar, neither counted twice nor dropped.
MOIC = (exit equity + cumulative distributions) / entry equity, floored at 0.0× in a total loss. Gross IRR = MOIC^(1/holding period) − 1 without interim distributions, otherwise via a cash flow solver.
The percentage attribution shows how much of the value creation was “earned” (operational + deleveraging) versus “market” (multiple re-rating). That is the key honesty question in any deal review.
Multiple contraction, EBITDA decline and re-leveraging (recap) appear with the correct sign as negative bars. The model does not flatter the result.

Methodology: SourcingClub, as of Q2/2026. Simplified model, not valuation, tax or investment advice.

How the value creation bridge works

The model is built on the identity equity = EBITDA × multiple − net debt. The change in value between entry and exit therefore has three sources: more (or less) EBITDA, a higher (or lower) valuation multiple and less (or more) net debt. The key to an exact breakdown is the cross term: if both EBITDA and the multiple grow, there is an interaction effect (ΔEBITDA × ΔMultiple) that has to be allocated to one source. The model values EBITDA growth at the entry multiple and multiple expansion at the exit EBITDA. As a result, the cross term is absorbed exactly once into the multiple bar, and the three drivers add up to the total equity value creation without any residual. This is the standard decomposition used in the LP reporting of the large funds.

Exit equity = entry equity + EBITDA growth + multiple expansion + deleveraging

If you want to see the interaction separately, switch to the four-bar view: pure multiple expansion (ΔMultiple × entry EBITDA), the cross term (ΔEBITDA × ΔMultiple) as its own bar, plus EBITDA growth and deleveraging. This breakdown also reconciles exactly. Interim distributions and recaps are deliberately kept out of the bridge, which only measures the change in value of the equity position. Distributions only increase MOIC and IRR as an additional cash return. A debt-funded recap therefore appears both as a negative deleveraging bar (the debt was raised) and as a positive MOIC contribution (the cash was paid out). That is not double counting but two different measures.

MOIC, IRR and “earned vs. market”

MOIC and IRR follow the convention of the sister LBO calculator. With a single exit cash flow, the closed form IRR = MOIC^(1/holding period) − 1 applies. As soon as there are cumulative distributions, the model places them as a single payment in the middle of the holding period and solves the IRR by bisection. This simplification, used in the absence of a detailed distribution schedule, biases the IRR slightly upwards and is shown transparently. The attribution makes the key honesty point visible: how much of the value creation was “earned” (operational EBITDA growth plus actual debt repayment), and how much simply came from a friendlier valuation environment at exit? If the drivers largely offset each other and net value creation is small, the tool hides the percentages and only shows the reliable euro bars.

Buy and build, value creation or exit preparation?

I support PE funds and owners in the DACH Mittelstand, from proprietary origination and platform strategy through to value creation over the holding period.

Confidential initial call

Frequently asked questions

Why do the three drivers add up exactly to the equity value creation?

Because EBITDA growth is valued at the entry multiple and multiple expansion at the exit EBITDA. Algebraically, the overlapping terms (exit EBITDA × entry multiple) cancel out exactly, so EBITDA growth + multiple expansion + deleveraging equals exit equity − entry equity to the cent. The EBITDA × multiple cross term is absorbed exactly once into the multiple bar: no residual and no double counting. The residual is always zero.

Where does the cross term between EBITDA growth and multiple growth go?

In the standard three-bar view, it sits in the multiple bar (because that bar is valued at the exit EBITDA). The tool also shows it as a separate figure, the combination or interaction term. If you want to see it as its own bar, switch to the four-bar view, which also reconciles exactly.

Does deleveraging count the leverage effect on the IRR twice?

No. Deleveraging in the bridge is the actual net debt repayment (entry net debt − exit net debt), i.e. cash generated that flows one to one into equity. The leverage effect itself, the fact that a smaller entry equity multiplies the return, works through the denominator of MOIC and IRR and is not a separate bar in the bridge. The two measure different things and do not overlap.

How is the MOIC calculated with a recap or an interim distribution?

MOIC = (exit equity + cumulative distributions) / entry equity. Distributions increase the cash returned to the sponsor but do NOT change the equity bridge itself. With a debt-funded recap you therefore see a negative deleveraging bar (more debt) and a higher MOIC (cash paid out) at the same time. That is consistent, not contradictory.

What happens with value destruction or a total loss?

The bridge remains exact: negative drivers (EBITDA decline, multiple contraction, re-leveraging) appear as negative bars. The attribution is normalised by the absolute amount of value creation, so the sign of each driver stays readable and the shares add up to −100%. If the proceeds are negative, the MOIC is floored at 0.0× (you cannot lose more than the equity invested) and the IRR is then not defined (n/a).

Who is the value creation bridge for?

For PE deal teams and operating partners who need to show in LP reporting or in a post-mortem where the return came from. And for owners and sellers who want to understand how a financial investor creates value: how much of it is genuine operational performance, how much is balance sheet optimisation and how much is simply a friendlier market at exit.