English

EBITDA Multiples DACH 2026

Current EBITDA valuation multiples for SMEs in Germany, Austria and Switzerland across 16 industries. Updated regularly based on transaction data.

Diese Seite auf Deutsch lesen →

EBITDA Multiples by Industry

The following table shows current EBITDA multiples for SMEs in the DACH region (Germany, Austria, Switzerland) with EBITDA between EUR 0.5M and EUR 5M. The multiples reflect typical valuation ranges observed in M&A transactions.

IndustryMinMedianMaxTrend
Software & SaaS6.0x9.0x14.0x
IT Services & Managed Services5.0x7.0x10.0x
Healthcare & Medical Technology5.0x7.0x10.0x
Environmental & Waste Management4.5x6.5x9.0x
Building Technology & Fire Protection4.5x6.0x8.0x
Electrical Engineering & Automation4.5x6.0x8.5x
Industrial Services4.0x5.5x7.5x
Machinery & Plant Engineering4.0x5.7x8.0x
Facility Management4.0x5.5x7.0x
Logistics & Transport3.5x5.0x7.0x
Consulting & Professional Services3.5x5.0x8.0x
Other Services3.5x5.0x7.0x
Other Manufacturing3.5x5.0x7.0x
Construction & Trades3.0x4.5x6.0x
E-Commerce & Retail3.0x4.0x6.0x
Food & Hospitality2.5x4.0x5.5x

Source: Aggregated public transaction data for DACH SMEs, 2024–2026. Own analysis. Multiples represent Enterprise Value / EBITDA for companies with EUR 0.5–5M EBITDA.

Key Factors Influencing Multiples

Revenue Quality

Recurring revenue (SaaS, maintenance contracts) commands 30-50% higher multiples than project-based businesses.

Growth Rate

Companies growing >10% CAGR achieve 1.0-2.0x higher multiples. Organic growth is valued more than acquisition-driven growth.

Owner Dependency

Businesses that operate independently of the founder are worth significantly more. A strong second management tier is key.

Market Position

Market leaders and niche champions command premium valuations. Regional monopolies in fragmented markets are highly attractive.

Customer Concentration

High dependency on a single customer (>20% of revenue) reduces multiples by 0.5-1.5x. Diversified portfolios are preferred.

EBITDA Size

Larger EBITDA = higher multiple. Companies with >EUR 3M EBITDA typically achieve 1.0-2.0x more than sub-EUR 1M businesses.

Regional Differences within DACH

Countryvs. German BaselineKey Drivers
GermanyBaselineLargest M&A market, deepest Mittelstand, highest transaction volume
Austria-5% to -15%Smaller market, lower liquidity, but no trade tax (Gewerbesteuer)
Switzerland+10% to +20%Higher margins, CHF stability, tax-free capital gains for individuals

Valuation Example

IT Services Company, Munich

  • Revenue: EUR 8.0M | EBITDA: EUR 1.2M (15% margin)
  • Industry multiple: 7.0x (median for IT Services)
  • Enterprise Value: EUR 1.2M × 7.0x = EUR 8.4M
  • Less: Net debt EUR 0.8M
  • Equity Value: EUR 7.6M

This is an indicative calculation. Actual transaction prices depend on negotiation dynamics, synergies, and deal structure.

Calculate Your Company Value

Use our free valuation calculator for an indicative enterprise value based on current DACH market multiples.

Open Calculator →

Frequently Asked Questions

Häufig gestellte Fragen

What are typical EBITDA multiples in the DACH region?

EBITDA multiples for SMEs in the DACH region (Germany, Austria, Switzerland) typically range from 4.0x to 8.0x, depending on the industry, company size, and growth profile. Software and SaaS companies can achieve 8.0x to 14.0x, while traditional manufacturing and construction businesses are valued at 3.0x to 6.0x. Switzerland generally sees multiples 10-20% higher than Germany due to higher profitability and economic stability.

How do DACH multiples compare to other European markets?

DACH multiples are broadly in line with Western European averages but benefit from the region's strong industrial base and SME ecosystem (Mittelstand). Compared to the UK, DACH multiples tend to be slightly lower for services businesses but comparable for industrial companies. Scandinavian multiples are similar, while Southern European markets typically see a 10-20% discount. The key differentiator in DACH is the depth of the Mittelstand — the 3+ million family-owned SMEs that create a uniquely active M&A market.

What factors influence EBITDA multiples the most?

The three most impactful factors are: (1) Revenue quality — recurring revenue models (subscriptions, maintenance contracts) command significantly higher multiples than project-based businesses. (2) Growth rate — companies growing above 10% CAGR achieve materially higher valuations. (3) Owner dependency — businesses that operate independently of the founder are more valuable to acquirers. Additional factors include market position, customer concentration, management depth, and regulatory environment.

What is the difference between EBIT and EBITDA multiples?

EBIT multiples include depreciation and amortization in their base figure, making them lower than EBITDA multiples for the same company. For capital-intensive industries (machinery, logistics), the difference is significant. EBITDA multiples are more commonly used in M&A because they allow better comparison across companies with different depreciation policies. For asset-light businesses (consulting, software), the difference is minimal.

How do I calculate enterprise value using EBITDA multiples?

Enterprise Value = EBITDA x Multiple. To derive the equity value (what the seller actually receives), subtract net financial debt and add excess cash. Example: An IT services company with EUR 1.2M EBITDA and a 7.0x multiple has an Enterprise Value of EUR 8.4M. With EUR 0.8M net debt, the Equity Value is EUR 7.6M. Note that the actual transaction price may deviate 10-30% based on negotiation dynamics, synergies, and deal structure.

Are these multiples applicable to larger companies?

The multiples shown here are representative of SMEs with EBITDA between EUR 0.5M and EUR 5M. Larger companies (EBITDA > EUR 10M) typically achieve higher multiples due to lower risk, better diversification, and more institutional buyer interest. Platform acquisitions by PE funds are generally valued 1.0-2.0x higher than add-on acquisitions in the same sector. For companies above EUR 50M EBITDA, public market comparables and DCF valuations become more relevant benchmarks.